DDMMON-16 Lower Duncan River fish stranding impact monitoring: Year 9 Report

DDMMON-16 Lower Duncan River fish stranding impact monitoring: Year 9 Report

Author: Golder Associates Ltd



This report presents results from Years 1 to 9 of the LDR fish stranding impact monitoring program (FSIMP). In conjunction with other assessment tools being developed during the monitoring period, the FSIMP assesses Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and Mountain Whitefish (Prosopium williamsoni) population level impacts associated with dam operations during the review period. Separate abundance estimates were conducted for Mountain Whitefish and Rainbow Trout juveniles. Hierarchical Bayesian Models (HBMs) were used to estimate total abundance. A fish stranding assessment followed the methodology developed for the Duncan River in 2004 [Strategy for Managing Fish Stranding Impacts in the lower Duncan River Associated with Flow Reductions at Duncan Dam (BC Hydro 2004)].

Based on the current state of knowledge, the flow reduction measures implemented under the Water Use Plan (water use plan) are effective at reducing fish stranding. Based on collected data and the life history of species present in the system, DDM operations can increase the risk of stranding in certain seasons and during periods of longer wetted histories. Based on the data collected up to April 2017, documented stranding rates of juvenile Mountain Whitefish (Prosopium williamsoni) are very low and are not believed to result in population level effects, while the current interstitial stranding estimates for juvenile Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) are too uncertain to inform a confident total stranding estimate.

Based on the current state of knowledge, the flow reduction measures implemented under the Water Use Plan (water use plan) are effective at reducing fish stranding. Based on collected data and the life history of species present in the system, DDM operations can increase the risk of stranding in certain seasons and during periods of longer wetted histories. Based on the data collected up to April 2017, documented stranding rates of juvenile Mountain Whitefish (Prosopium williamsoni) are very low and are not believed to result in population level effects, while the current interstitial stranding estimates for juvenile Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) are too uncertain to inform a confident total stranding estimate.





DDMMON-16 Lower Duncan River fish stranding impact monitoring: Year 9 Report

Author: Golder Associates Ltd

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
This report presents results from Years 1 to 9 of the LDR fish stranding impact monitoring program (FSIMP). In conjunction with other assessment tools being developed during the monitoring period, the FSIMP assesses Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and Mountain Whitefish (Prosopium williamsoni) population level impacts associated with dam operations during the review period. Separate abundance estimates were conducted for Mountain Whitefish and Rainbow Trout juveniles. Hierarchical Bayesian Models (HBMs) were used to estimate total abundance. A fish stranding assessment followed the methodology developed for the Duncan River in 2004 [Strategy for Managing Fish Stranding Impacts in the lower Duncan River Associated with Flow Reductions at Duncan Dam (BC Hydro 2004)].

Summary

Based on the current state of knowledge, the flow reduction measures implemented under the Water Use Plan (water use plan) are effective at reducing fish stranding. Based on collected data and the life history of species present in the system, DDM operations can increase the risk of stranding in certain seasons and during periods of longer wetted histories. Based on the data collected up to April 2017, documented stranding rates of juvenile Mountain Whitefish (Prosopium williamsoni) are very low and are not believed to result in population level effects, while the current interstitial stranding estimates for juvenile Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) are too uncertain to inform a confident total stranding estimate.

ID, 'resources', true); ?>

Additional Info:

Published: 2018
Study Years: 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008


Resources Data:

Name:
Format:
URL:


*/ ?>