Arrow Reservoir Constant Mid-Elevation Scenarios: Scoping Evaluation
Author: A. Thomson, B. Green, G. Utzig, N. Kapell
This presentation assessed various impacts of two constant mid-elevation scenarios, alternatives to the current operating regime. The evaluation of the two scenarios included potential benefits and negative impacts, information gaps, scenario alternatives to increase benefits and/or offset impacts, and criteria for assessing future modeling.
See “Conclusions” table in presentation (slides 35-36).
See “Conclusions” table in presentation (slides 35-36).
Resources Data:
Name: ARROW-MID-ELEVATION-ALTERNATIVES-FAUQUIER-SEPT-2016-FINAL
Format: PDF
URL: https://engage.gov.bc.ca/app/uploads/sites/6/2017/02/Arrow-Mid-Elevation-Alternatives-Fauquier-Sept-2016-FINAL.pdf
Additional Info
Study Years: 2016
Published: 2016
Topics
Tags: Acipenser Transmontanus, Agriculture, Amphibians, Archaeology, Arrow Lakes Generating Station, Arrow Lakes Reservoir, Birds, Burbot, Erosion, Fish, Flood Control, Hydrology, Littoral Zone, Lota Lota, Macrophytes, Mammals, Midelevation Alternatives, Monitoring Recommendations, Navigation, Operational Recommendations, Power Generation, Rearing, Recreation, Reptiles, Revelstoke Dam, Riverine Productivity, Sediment, Spawning, Tributary Access, Vegetation, White SturgeonArrow Reservoir Constant Mid-Elevation Scenarios: Scoping Evaluation
Author: A. Thomson, B. Green, G. Utzig, N. Kapell
Tags: Acipenser Transmontanus, Agriculture, Amphibians, Archaeology, Arrow Lakes Generating Station, Arrow Lakes Reservoir, Birds, Burbot, Erosion, Fish, Flood Control, Hydrology, Littoral Zone, Lota Lota, Macrophytes, Mammals, Midelevation Alternatives, Monitoring Recommendations, Navigation, Operational Recommendations, Power Generation, Rearing, Recreation, Reptiles, Revelstoke Dam, Riverine Productivity, Sediment, Spawning, Tributary Access, Vegetation, White Sturgeon
This presentation assessed various impacts of two constant mid-elevation scenarios, alternatives to the current operating regime. The evaluation of the two scenarios included potential benefits and negative impacts, information gaps, scenario alternatives to increase benefits and/or offset impacts, and criteria for assessing future modeling.
Summary
See “Conclusions” table in presentation (slides 35-36).